Volume 5, Issue 3 (Aug 2017)                   Res Mol Med (RMM) 2017, 5(3): 21-25 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akhondnezhad M, Bakhti M, Nasrolahei M, Shabankhani B, Goli H R. Molecular Detection of Enterococcal Surface Protein (esp) Gene in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated from Dental Calculus of Patients in Sari, Iran. Res Mol Med (RMM) 2017; 5 (3) :21-25
URL: http://rmm.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-234-en.html
1- 1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran
2- Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran
3- 1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran, Iran , goli59@gmail.com
Abstract:   (4700 Views)

Background: Enterococci are important gram-positive bacteria causing dental calculus in human beings; however, the role of these bacteria in oral cavity is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of Enterococcal Surface Protein (esp) gene in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from dental calculus in the city of Sari, Iran.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, 207 dental calculus samples were collected from patients. The isolates were identified by growth on Bile Esculin agar, Gram stain, Catalase test, Growth at 6.5% NaCl, PYR and arabinose fermentation test. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the isolates was determined by disk agar diffusion method. The presence of esp gene was assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Results: Among the 56 (27%) enterococci isolated from dental calculus, 43 (76.7%) were determined as E. faecalis. The resistance rate to ampicillin, vancomycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin in E. faecalis isolates was estimated as 13.9%, 4.6%, 11.6%, 6.9% and 13.9%, respectively. The esp gene was detected in 18.6% of E. faecalis isolates. Among the isolates containing esp gene, 33.3%, 50%, 40%, 33.3% and 33.3% of them were resistant to ampicillin, vancomycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin, respectively.
Conclusion: E. faecalis is an important organism causing dental calculus but the presence of esp gene had no correlation with the resistance to tested antimicrobial agents.
 

Full-Text [PDF 489 kb]   (1826 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Microbiology
Published: 2017/12/16

References
1. Anderson AC, Jonas D, Huber I, Karygianni L, Wölber J, Hellwig E, et al. Enterococcus faecalis from Food, clinical specimens, and oral sites: prevalence of virulence factors in association with biofilm formation. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016; 6:1534. PMID: 26793174 [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01534]
2. Strateva T, Atanasova D, Savov E, Petrova G, Mitov I. Incidence of virulence determinants in clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates collected in Bulgaria. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016; 20(2):127-33. PMID: 26849965 [DOI:10.1016/j.bjid.2015.11.011]
3. Banerjee T, Anupurba S. Prevalence of virulence factors and drug resistance in clinical isolates of Enterococci: A study from North India. Journal of pathogens. 2015; 2015. PMID: 26366302.
4. Alnasra NA, Badran EF, Dajan N, Shehabi AA. Antimicrobial susceptibility and virulence factors of Enterococci colonizing intestinal tract of infants. The International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2016; 6
5. Kouidhi B, Zmantar T, Mahdouani K, Hentati H, Bakhrouf A. Antibiotic resistance and adhesion properties of oral Enterococci associated to dental caries. BMC microbiology. 2011; 11(1):155. PMID: 21714920 [DOI:10.1186/1471-2180-11-155]
6. Fallico L, Boldrin C, Grossato A, Franchin E, De Canale E, Tommasini T, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium isolates from an Italian hospital. Infection. 2011; 39(2):127-33. PMID: 21327628 [DOI:10.1007/s15010-011-0086-8]
7. Toledo-Arana A, Valle J, Solano C, Arrizubieta MaJ, Cucarella C, Lamata M, et al. The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2001; 67(10):4538-45. PMID: 11571153. [DOI:10.1128/AEM.67.10.4538-4545.2001]
8. Wu H, Moser C, Wang H-Z, Høiby N, Song Z-J. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections. International journal of oral science. 2015; 7(1):1-7. PMID: 25504208 [DOI:10.1038/ijos.2014.65]
9. Frank KL, Vergidis P, Brinkman CL, Quaintance KEG, Barnes AM, Mandrekar JN, et al. Evaluation of the Enterococcus faecalis biofilm-associated virulence factors AhrC and Eep in rat foreign body osteomyelitis and in vitro biofilm-associated antimicrobial resistance. PloS one. 2015; 10(6):e0130187. PMID: 26076451 [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0130187]
10. de la Fuente-Nú-ez C, Korolik V, Bains M, Nguyen U, Breidenstein EB, Horsman S, et al. Inhibition of bacterial biofilm formation and swarming motility by a small synthetic cationic peptide. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2012; 56(5):2696-704. PMID: 22354291 [DOI:10.1128/AAC.00064-12]
11. Jhajharia K, Parolia A, Shetty KV, Mehta LK. Biofilm in endodontics: a review. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2015; 5(1):1. PMID: 25767760 [DOI:10.4103/2231-0762.151956]
12. Kim D, Sengupta A, Niepa TH, Lee B-H, Weljie A, Freitas-Blanco VS, et al. Candida albicans stimulates Streptococcus mutans microcolony development via cross-kingdom biofilm-derived metabolites. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7. PMID: 28134351 [DOI:10.1038/srep41332]
13. Tille P. Bailey & Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
14. Winn Washington C, Allen SD, Janda WM, Koneman EW, Procop GW, Schreckenberger PC, et al. Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiolgy: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-seven informational supplement. M100-S27, Wayne (PA); 2017
16. Leavis HL, Willems RJ, Top J, Spalburg E, Mascini EM, Fluit AC, et al. Epidemic and nonepidemic multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Emerging infectious diseases. 2003; 9(9):1108. PMID: 14519248 [DOI:10.3201/eid0909.020383]
17. Sharifi Y, Hasani A, Ghotaslou R, Naghili B, Aghazadeh M, Milani M, et al. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance in enterococci isolated from urinary tract infections. Adv Pharm Bull. 2013; 3(1):197-201. PMID: 24312835
18. Kafil HS, Mobarez AM, Moghadam MF. Adhesion and virulence factor properties of Enterococci isolated from clinical samples in Iran. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 2013; 56(3):238. PMID: 24152500 [DOI:10.4103/0377-4929.120375]
19. de Marques EB, Suzart S. Occurrence of virulence-associated genes in clinical Enterococcus faecalis strains isolated in Londrina, Brazil. Journal of medical microbiology. 2004; 53(11):1069-73. PMID: 15496382 [DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.45654-0]
20. Padilla C, Nú-ez M, Padilla A, Lobos O. Genes de virulencia y bacteriocinas en cepas de Enterococcus faecalis aisladas desde diferentes muestras clínicas en la Región del Maule, Chile. Revista chilena de infectología. 2012; 29(1):55-61. PMID: 22552513 [DOI:10.4067/S0716-10182012000100010]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Molecular Medicine

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb